The Motorola Razr 70 is appropriate a minor substitute. It’s a ways quiet a if reality be told stylish and unprecedented foldable with you too can attract slightly plenty of attention. Our take a look at instrument in explicit looks very classy: it comes with a help that seems like it is made of limited mother-of-pearl flakes.
On the diversified hand, the associated price has also risen with available being any well-known equipment upgrades: just a few p.c more AI efficiency right here, a moderately higher-probability camera there. The reminiscence has also develop to be a shrimp bit sooner and the battery lasts longer, nonetheless quiet would not lower a if reality be told staunch resolve in comparison to diversified clamshell foldables.
The Motorola Razr 70 (Razr 2026) affords an though-provoking belief, looks very gorgeous and has though-provoking usage scenarios, as an instance as a camcorder. Alternatively, the competition from Samsung or Xiaomi affords drastically better efficiency and longer runtimes.
And then there may maybe be remaining one year’s model, the Razr 60, which isn’t any longer continuously any worse and charges appropriate over half as powerful. So you should take a shut study the selections sooner than purchasing the Razr 70 must you want the staunch price for cash.
Pros
+ sublime, unprecedented carry out
+ noble enviornment subject alternate choices
+ staunch workmanship
+ brilliant displays
+ legit operation
+ many 5G frequencies
+ versatile camera bid
Cons
– high build
– low efficiency
– mediocre battery existence
– no longer water-resistant
– USB 2.0
– PWM flickering
The Motorola Razr 2026 is available at diversified web dealers, e.g. at amazon.com for round US$ 800.
$799.99
Motorola Razr 2026 | Unlocked | Made for US 8/256GB | 50MP Digicam | Shimmering White
Demonstrate
6.90 dawdle 20:9, 2640 x 1080 pixel 413 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Second display: 3.6 dawdle, 1,066 x 1,056 pixel, P-OLED, Gorilla Glass Victus, 90 Hz, soundless: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB
, 201 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Vitality Transport (PD), Audio Connections: audio through USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration, gyroscope, proximity, compass, barometer
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n=Wi-Fi 4/ac=Wi-Fi 5/ax=Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B66), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n75/n77/n78), Twin SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.3 x 171.3 x 74 (=0.29 x 6.74 x 2.91 in)
Battery
4800 mAh Lithium-Ion, 30 Watt wired charging, 15 Watt wireless charging
Charging
wireless charging, like a flash charging / Quickcharge
Running System
Android 16
Digicam
Main Digicam: 50 MPix f/1.7, phase shift AF, OIS, LED flash, movies @2160p/30fps (camera 1); 50.0MP, f/2.0, extensive angle (camera 2)
Secondary Digicam: 32 MPix f/2.4, movies @2160p/30fps
Extra parts
Audio system: stereo audio system (hybrid), USB cable, SIM application, 24 Months Guarantee, IP48 certified, eSIM toughen, fanless
Weight
188 g (= 6.63 oz / 0.41 pounds)
Point to: The producer may maybe maybe bid substances from diversified suppliers in conjunction with existing panels, drives or reminiscence sticks with identical specs.
The Motorola Razr has always been unprecedented: In frail times a clamshell phone with a immense-flat carry out, now a clamshell foldable smartphone that also reveals your entire necessary facts on the exterior existing.
And then there are the unprecedented supplies used for the casing: Carrying Inexperienced is available in Pantone colours with a synthetic leather-love texture, while the grey Hematite is more paying homage to enviornment subject. Our take a look at instrument is available in Shimmering White, is made of acetate plastic and looks as if little mother-of-pearl flakes had been placed on the smartphone, which also refract the gentle otherwise.
The subject subject transitions are neat and the workmanship is staunch. Alternatively, when our take a look at instrument is opened and zigzag, there are explicit creaking noises and a limited shifting in the center of the hinge.
The phone isn’t any longer water-resistant and mustn’t be uncovered to soiled environments.
256 GB of mass storage and eight GB of RAM remain essentially the most straight forward reminiscence variant. The USB 2.0 port has no longer been improved either.
Due to their advanced technology, flip telephones continuously must accept barriers by methodology of parts. As an illustration, the Razr 70 simplest has WiFi 6E as the quickest Wi-Fi traditional. The speeds are slightly stable and appropriate about ample for a gigabit web connection.
The 5G modem has slightly plenty of frequencies in deliver that that you just may maybe also with out concerns entry the cell community even when touring. Reception is staunch in space assessments at some level of our take a look at.
The 120 Hz display internal may maybe maybe also furthermore be operated reliably and the crease on the hinge is barely noticeable or viewed. This stays the case even after 2 weeks of sorting out. The exterior existing also responds reliably.
The fingerprint sensor is integrated in the standby button and unlocks the phone very reliably. Unlocking the bid of facial recognition is probably going during the cameras on the within and outdoors.
| Networking | |
| Motorola Razr 70 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| Motorola Razr 60 Wi-Fi 6E |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| Xiaomi Combine Flip 2 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| Average of class Smartphone |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Android 16 is pre-installed on the phone. Motorola guarantees simplest four years of updates for its flip phone and three vital Android updates.
In response to the producer, updates are to happen every two months, which we can no longer ascertain at the time of sorting out attributable to the dwelling of the protection patches from March 2026.
The packaging is plastic-free, otherwise sustainability facts on the Razr 70 is scarce.

The extensive-angle camera has been upgraded and has a probability of 50 megapixels. It takes decent snapshots, nonetheless is moderately blurred intimately.
The first camera also has a probability of 50 megapixels. The image quality is at a staunch level, nonetheless can no longer defend up with used high-end telephones.
The internal camera has a probability of 32 megapixels. The pictures may maybe maybe carry out with a shrimp bit more dynamic fluctuate and distinction.
A radiant feature of the Razr 70 is that that you just may maybe also furthermore situation it up and thus win by with out a tripod or simply bid the first camera for selfies attributable to the second existing.

14.7 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
15 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
9 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
1.2 ∆E

22.5 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
32.5 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
33.2 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
40.5 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
33.3 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
28.5 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
38.3 ∆E
39.9 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
30.4 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
Both the internal well-known existing and the outer existing are brilliant, so there may maybe be nothing to end it getting used outdoors or in brilliant environments. The coloration reproduction of the internal existing is intensely excellent, while the outer existing is a shrimp bit much less excellent.
We measured PWM flickering with a frequency of 67 Hz on the first existing, so sensitive folk must positively have a study present sooner than purchasing.
| 1288 cd/m² |
1302 cd/m² |
1313 cd/m² |
||
| 1322 cd/m² |
1331 cd/m² |
1342 cd/m² |
||
| 1347 cd/m² |
1312 cd/m² |
1305 cd/m² |
||
Distribution of brightness
examined with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1347 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1318 cd/m² Minimal: 0.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1347 cd/m²
Distinction: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.98}
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
CCT: 6248 Ok
| 1104 cd/m² |
1122 cd/m² |
1153 cd/m² |
||
| 1154 cd/m² |
1154 cd/m² |
1122 cd/m² |
||
| 1101 cd/m² |
1122 cd/m² |
1134 cd/m² |
||
Distribution of brightness
examined with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1154 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1129.6 cd/m² Minimal: 3.07 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1154 cd/m²
Distinction: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.99 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.98}
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.084
CCT: 6466 Ok
| Motorola Razr 70 AMOLED, 2640×1080, 6.9″ |
Motorola Razr 60 P-OLED, 2640×1080, 6.9″ |
Xiaomi Combine Flip 2 AMOLED, 2912×1224, 6.9″ |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 AMOLED, 2520×1080, 6.9″ |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display veil |
0% |
-35% |
-20% |
|
| Brightness heart (cd/m²) |
1331 |
1185 -11% |
1077 -19% |
1349 1% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) |
1318 |
1178 -11% |
1036 -21% |
1354 3% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) |
96 |
94 -2% |
95 -1% |
98 2% |
| Black Stage * (cd/m²) | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * |
1.2 |
1.31 -9% |
2.11 -76% |
2.2 -83% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * |
2.18 |
1.78 18% |
3.62 -66% |
3.3 -51% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * |
1.8 |
1.5 17% |
2.3 -28% |
1.6 11% |
| Gamma |
2.2 100% |
2.133 103% |
2.155 102% |
2.06 107% |
| CCT |
6248 104% |
6382 102% |
6275 104% |
6484 100% |
* … smaller is more healthy
Display veil Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To sunless the display, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in like a flash succession – a approach referred to as Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This biking frequency must ideally be undetectable to the human witness. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may maybe maybe expertise stress or complications and even gape the flickering altogether.
| Display veil flickering / PWM detected | 67 Hz Amplitude: 14 % |
![]() |
|
|
The existing backlight flickers at 67 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 67 Hz is intensely low, so the flickering may maybe maybe trigger eyestrain and complications after extended bid. When in comparison: 52 % of all examined devices carry out no longer bid PWM to sunless the present. If PWM used to be detected, a median of 7822 (minimal: 1.31 – maximum: 343500) Hz used to be measured. |
|||
Measurement sequence with fastened zoom level and diversified brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimal brightness looks flat, nonetheless this is attributable to the scaling. The facts field reveals the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimal brightness)
Demonstrate Response Times
ℹ
Demonstrate response times existing how like a flash the display is ready to trade from one coloration to the next. Late response times can lead to afterimages and may maybe maybe trigger fascinating objects to look blurry (ghosting). Avid gamers of like a flash-paced 3D titles must pay particular attention to like a flash response times.
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2.2 ms … rise ↗ and tumble ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise |
![]() |
| ↘ 1.2 ms tumble | ||
| The display reveals very like a flash response rates in our assessments and must be very neatly suited to like a flash-paced gaming. When in comparison, all examined devices fluctuate from 0.1 (minimal) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This implies that the measured response time is more healthy than the frequent of all examined devices (19.9 ms). |
||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44 ms … rise ↗ and tumble ↘ combined | ↗ 1.5 ms rise |
![]() |
| ↘ 42.5 ms tumble | ||
| The display reveals slack response rates in our assessments and shall be unsatisfactory for avid gamers. When in comparison, all examined devices fluctuate from 0.165 (minimal) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This implies that the measured response time is worse than the frequent of all examined devices (31.1 ms). |
||
The MediaTek Dimensity 7450X affords just a few more p.c of AI efficiency, nonetheless otherwise it is miles the same as the 7400X from the Razr 60. The efficiency is moderately low in comparison to foldables from Samsung or Xiaomi. Tender daily operation is mostly likely, nonetheless as rapidly as it comes to more traumatic tasks, the phone appears overwhelmed.
At the very least the reminiscence has been upgraded with UFS 3.1 flash. It’s a ways isn’t any longer as like a flash as the competition, nonetheless quiet a well-known upgrade in comparison to its predecessor.
The phone can heat up beneath extended load, nonetheless does no longer attain coarse temperatures. The SoC also does no longer throttle.
The limited speaker on the bottom edge is supported by the earpiece. The scheme sounds slightly decent, nonetheless the maximum volume shall be higher. There are slightly plenty of wireless audio codecs for connecting headphones or audio system.
The battery has grown by 300 mAh to 4,800 mAh. The phone does no longer carry out if reality be told staunch runtimes in our WLAN take a look at. Alternatively, 14:19 hours is ample for a working day. The phone may maybe maybe also furthermore be charged with as much as 30 watts through cable or as much as fifteen watts wirelessly.
| Geekbench 6.6 | |
| Single-Core | |
| Xiaomi Combine Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 |
|
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 |
|
| Average of class Smartphone (196 – 3883, n=198, remaining 2 years) |
|
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7450X (n=1) |
|
| Motorola Razr 60 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Multi-Core | |
| Xiaomi Combine Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 |
|
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 |
|
| Average of class Smartphone (830 – 11811, n=198, remaining 2 years) |
|
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7450X (n=1) |
|
| Motorola Razr 60 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Salvage | |
| Motorola Razr 60 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Average of class Smartphone (270 – 7687, n=87, remaining 2 years) |
|
| Wild Life Limitless Salvage | |
| Xiaomi Combine Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 |
|
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 |
|
| Average of class Smartphone (271 – 30892, n=180, remaining 2 years) |
|
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7450X (n=1) |
|
| Motorola Razr 60 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Wild Life Outrageous | |
| Xiaomi Combine Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 |
|
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 |
|
| Average of class Smartphone (61 – 8263, n=181, remaining 2 years) |
|
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7450X (n=1) |
|
| Motorola Razr 60 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Wild Life Outrageous Limitless | |
| Xiaomi Combine Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 |
|
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 |
|
| Average of class Smartphone (62 – 8271, n=180, remaining 2 years) |
|
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7450X (n=1) |
|
| Motorola Razr 60 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| GFXBench | |
| on display Aztec Ruins Customary Tier Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 |
|
| Xiaomi Combine Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 |
|
| Average of class Smartphone (6.2 – 166, n=193, remaining 2 years) |
|
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7450X (n=1) |
|
| Motorola Razr 60 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| 1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Customary Tier Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Combine Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 |
|
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 |
|
| Average of class Smartphone (3.4 – 378, n=193, remaining 2 years) |
|
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7450X (n=1) |
|
| Motorola Razr 60 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| on display Aztec Ruins Excessive Tier Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 |
|
| Xiaomi Combine Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 |
|
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 – 144, n=194, remaining 2 years) |
|
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7450X (n=1) |
|
| Motorola Razr 60 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| 2560×1440 Aztec Ruins Excessive Tier Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Combine Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 |
|
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 |
|
| Average of class Smartphone (1.2 – 151, n=193, remaining 2 years) |
|
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7450X (n=1) |
|
| Motorola Razr 60 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| 3840×2160 4K Aztec Ruins Excessive Tier Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Combine Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 |
|
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 |
|
| Average of class Smartphone (0.54 – 62, n=194, remaining 2 years) |
|
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7450X (n=1) |
|
| Motorola Razr 60 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision NPU 1.7 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (80 – 5210, n=105, remaining 2 years) |
|
| Xiaomi Combine Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 |
|
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7450X (n=1) |
|
| Motorola Razr 60 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 |
|
| Half of Precision NPU 1.7 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (80 – 36297, n=105, remaining 2 years) |
|
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7450X (n=1) |
|
| Motorola Razr 60 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Xiaomi Combine Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 |
|
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 |
|
| Quantized NPU 1.7 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (124 – 49889, n=105, remaining 2 years) |
|
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7450X (n=1) |
|
| Motorola Razr 60 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Xiaomi Combine Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288 |
|
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 |
|
| CrossMark | |
| Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (376 – 2856, n=114, remaining 2 years) |
|
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7450X (n=1) |
|
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288 |
|
| Productivity | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 – 2366, n=114, remaining 2 years) |
|
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7450X (n=1) |
|
| Creativity | |
| Average of class Smartphone (310 – 2123, n=114, remaining 2 years) |
|
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7450X (n=1) |
|
| Responsiveness | |
| Average of class Smartphone (466 – 13042, n=114, remaining 2 years) |
|
| Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 |
|
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7450X (n=1) |
|
| Motorola Razr 70 | Motorola Razr 60 | Xiaomi Combine Flip 2 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 |
-20% |
120% |
65% |
3% |
29% |
|
| Sequential Be taught 256KB (MB/s) |
1689.2 |
1020.1 -40% |
4083.53 142% |
4044.67 139% |
1767 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return untrue;”>?(950 – 3497, n=121) 5% |
2238 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(270 – 4370, n=183, remaining 2 years) 32% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) |
1188.1 |
918.4 -23% |
3894.12 228% |
2981.82 151% |
1224 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return untrue;”>?(166.8 – 2674, n=121) 3% |
1919 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(103.2 – 4113, n=183, remaining 2 years) 62% |
| Random Be taught 4KB (MB/s) |
296.7 |
266.2 -10% |
403.94 36% |
366.98 24% |
289 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return untrue;”>?(173.5 – 543, n=121) -3% |
307 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(47.6 – 614, n=183, remaining 2 years) 3% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) |
307.6 |
282.9 -8% |
534.73 74% |
143.67 -53% |
325 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return untrue;”>?(62.6 – 548, n=122) 6% |
360 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(13.1 – 1071, n=183, remaining 2 years) 17% |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 43.7 °C=111 F Average: 38.8 °C=102 F |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 40.9 °C=106 F Average: 36.5 °C=98 F |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vitality Provide (max.) 42.9 °C=109 F | Room Temperature 20 °C=68 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The moderate temperature for the upper aspect beneath maximal load is 38.8 °C / 102 F, in comparison to the frequent of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The utmost temperature on the upper aspect is 43.7 °C / 111 F, in comparison to the frequent of 35.3 °C / 96 F, starting from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats as much as a maximum of 40.9 °C / 106 F, in comparison to the frequent of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In inactive usage, the frequent temperature for the upper aspect is 28.5 °C / 83 F, in comparison to the instrument moderate of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Steadiness | |
| Motorola Razr 70 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7450X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
| Motorola Razr 60 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash |
|
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash |
|
| Wild Life Outrageous Stress Test | |
| Motorola Razr 60 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash |
|
| Motorola Razr 70 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7450X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
| Xiaomi Combine Flip 2 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash |
|
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash |
|
| Picture voltaic Bay Stress Test Steadiness | |
| Xiaomi Combine Flip 2 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash |
|
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash |
|
| Steel Nomad Gentle Stress Test Steadiness | |
| Motorola Razr 70 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7450X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash |
|
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash |
|
Motorola Razr 70 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7450X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø6.38 (6.37-6.4)
Motorola Razr 60 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.17 (6.16-6.18)
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø34.3 (33.2-38.7)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø18.3 (15.8-32.2)
Motorola Razr 70 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7450X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø23.5 (23.4-23.6)
Motorola Razr 60 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø22 (22-22.2)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø59.8 (51.8-111.9)
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø33.2 (31.9-39)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø21.4 (17.7-34)
Motorola Razr 70 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7450X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø3.22 (3.21-3.24)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø11 (9.57-18.9)
Frequency method (checkboxes may maybe maybe also furthermore be checked and unchecked to assessment devices)
Motorola Razr 70 audio prognosis
(+) | audio system can play slightly loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 – 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass – on moderate 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is moderate (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 – 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids – on moderate 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 – 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs – on moderate 8.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 – 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of total sound is moderate (21.3% incompatibility to median)
When in comparison with same class
» 41% of all examined devices in this class were better, 8% identical, 51% worse
» The suitable had a delta of 11%, moderate used to be 34%, worst used to be 134%
When in comparison with all devices examined
» 59% of all examined devices were better, 7% identical, 34% worse
» The suitable had a delta of 4%, moderate used to be 24%, worst used to be 134%
Motorola Razr 60 audio prognosis
(+) | audio system can play slightly loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 – 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass – on moderate 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is moderate (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 – 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids – simplest 3.9% a ways off from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 – 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs – on moderate 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 – 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of total sound is moderate (20.5% incompatibility to median)
When in comparison with same class
» 35% of all examined devices in this class were better, 9% identical, 56% worse
» The suitable had a delta of 11%, moderate used to be 34%, worst used to be 134%
When in comparison with all devices examined
» 54% of all examined devices were better, 8% identical, 38% worse
» The suitable had a delta of 4%, moderate used to be 24%, worst used to be 134%
Battery Runtime
| WiFi Websurfing | 14h 19min | |
Though the Razr 70 has made shrimp development, it is quiet a if reality be told gorgeous foldable with an unprecedented flair.
Whenever that you just may maybe also win the predecessors at an much less pricey build, you will simplest must dwell with limited compromises.

Motorola Razr 70
– 05/28/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Connectivity
46 / 69 → 66%
Video games Performance
18 / 55 → 33%
Application Performance
62 / 85 → 72%
Smartphone – Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
15%
Packaging
90%
Vitality Train
50%
Repairability
7%
Instrument Updates
60%
Entire Sustainability Salvage: 37%
|
Image |
Mannequin / Evaluation |
Mark |
Weight |
Pressure |
Demonstrate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1. 78%
|
Motorola Razr 70 MediaTek Dimensity 7450X ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 |
Amazon: Record Mark: 869€ | 188 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.90″ 2640×1080 413 PPI AMOLED |
|
2. 77.5%
|
Motorola Razr 60 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.2 |
Amazon: $979.00 Record Mark: 799€ |
188 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.90″ 2640×1080 413 PPI P-OLED |
|
3. 85.9%
|
Xiaomi Combine Flip 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x |
Amazon: 1. $484.97 Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 | U… 2. $599.99 Google Pixel Fold – Unlocked… 3. $1,177.forty eight Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold – U… Record Mark: 970€ |
199 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.86″ 2912×1224 460 PPI AMOLED |
|
4. 86.2%
|
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 950 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x |
Amazon: Record Mark: 1199€ | 188 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.90″ 2520×1080 397 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The collection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial group of workers. The take a look at sample used to be freely bought by the creator at his/her have expense. The lender had no influence on this assessment, nor did the producer receive a reproduction of this assessment sooner than publication. There used to be no responsibility to submit this assessment. As an just media company, Notebookcheck isn’t any longer subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is sorting out
Yearly, Notebookcheck independently critiques hundreds of laptops and smartphones the bid of standardized procedures to make it likely for every person results are similar. Now we have constantly developed our take a look at strategies for round twenty years and situation industry requirements in the process. In our take a look at labs, prime of the vary measuring equipment is utilized by skilled technicians and editors. These assessments involve a multi-stage validation process. Our advanced rating scheme is constant with hundreds of neatly-essentially based measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Extra facts on our take a look at strategies may maybe maybe also furthermore be stumbled on right here.

Editor of the distinctive article: Florian Schmitt – Managing Editor Cell – 1505 articles printed on Notebookcheck since 2009
I first and well-known wrote about gaming laptops as soon as I joined Notebookcheck in 2009. I used to be then alive to with the setup of the comparison portal Notebookinfo and worked with social media ideas for enormous companies love BMW and Adidas, while also returning to work for Notebookcheck in 2012. For the time being, I level of interest on smartphones, tablets, and future applied sciences. Since 2018 I if reality be told had been Managing Editor for cell instrument critiques, working alongside my colleague Daniel Schmidt.
Florian Schmitt, 2026-05-28 (Change: 2026-05-28)









